An application for expeditious hearing of a criminal appeal was rejected because the applicant was already released on bail and therefore could not be granted out-of-turn hearing. The single-judge bench dismissed the application.
Application for expeditious hearing rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9.APPA.1737.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1737 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.36 OF 2016
Paresh Ramprasad Nepali @ PD
… Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
... Respondent
Mr. Nitin Sejpal a/w. Mrs. Pooja N. Sejpal, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for respondent No.2/State. Mr. Tanaji Kolthe, PSI, Oshiwara Police Station.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J.
DATED : 28th NOVEMBER 2018.
P.C. :
The application was sent through the jail.
hearing can be granted to the appeal filed by the applicant.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
1/1
Aarti Palkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for expeditious hearing can be granted when the applicant is already on bail.
Paresh Ramprasad Nepali @ PD
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
