The High Court in Criminal Application No. 1598 of 2017 allowed the applicant's prayer for condonation of a 11-day delay in filing an appeal against his conviction under Section 304 IPC, finding the delay sufficiently explained.
The application for condonation of delay was allowed and the delay was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-APPA-1598-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1598 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.987 OF 2017
ANIL ARJUN MANE )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
Mr.S.R.Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 1st FEBRUARY 2018
P.C. :
1 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal challenging the conviction and resultant sentence imposed on the applicant/accused for the offence punishable under Section 304 (PartII) of the Indian Penal Code, by the learned trial court.
avk 1/2
905-APPA-1598-2017.doc
applicant/accused as well as the learned APP appearing for the State. Perused the application.
3 The delay in lodging the appeal challenging the conviction and the resultant sentence is only of 11 days and the same is sufficiently explained in the body of the application.
Hence, the order :
ORDER
i) The application is allowed.
ii) The delay in lodging the appeal is condoned.
iii)The application is disposed of.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 11 days in filing an appeal can be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ANIL ARJUN MANE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
