The Criminal High Court rejected the applicant's application for want of prosecution as the applicant was not interested in prosecuting it. The appeal hearing was expedited and listed for a subsequent week.
Application rejected for want of prosecution; appeal hearing expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(6)APPANo.1472016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.68 OF 2016
Ajay Balram Mandal ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 12th MARCH 2018.
P.C. :
2 It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the instant application.
3 The application is, therefore, rejected for want of prosecution.
4 However, hearing of the appeal is expedited . It be listed for hearing in the week commencing from 19th March 2018.
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Ajay Balram Mandal
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
