Allowed

Tatya Pandurang Gaikwad and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC14 Mar 2018APPA/142/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to applicants convicted under Sections 304B, 306, and 498A IPC who had deposited the fine. The court ordered a PR bond of Rs.25,000/- with sureties and monthly reporting to the police station.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicants on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000/- each with sureties and attending police stations on first Mondays.

Tatya Pandurang Gaikwad and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

16.APPA.142.18 in Apeal.86.18.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.142 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.86 OF 2018

¶4

Mr. Tatya Pandurang Gaikwad & Ors.

¶5

..Applicants

¶6

¶7

The State of Maharashtra

¶8

..Respondent

¶9

Mr. M.N. Sandhyanshiv for the Applicants. Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent State.

¶10

CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

¶11

DATE : 14^th MARCH 2018.

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

This is an application for suspension of sentence and releasing the applicants on bail.

¶14

The applicants are convicted for an offence punishable under Sections 304B, 306, 498A r/w.34 of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to suffer maximum imprisonment for seven years and to pay a total fine of Rs.2,000/- each by the learned District Judge-3 & Addl. Sessions Judge, Malegaon in Sessions Case No.72/2014 by its judgment and order dated 20.01.2018.

¶15

The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants have already deposited the entire fine amount imposed upon them in the Registry of the Trial Court.

¶16

Aarti Palkar

¶17

1/2

¶18

16.APPA.142.18 in Apeal.86.18.doc

¶19

The maximum sentence imposed upon the applicants is seven years and there is a remote possibility of appeal being heard on merits in near future. In view thereof, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶20

Hence, the following order.

¶21

(a) The applicants be released on bail in Sessions Case No.72/2014 on his furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one or two separate solvent local sureties in the like amount.

¶22

(b) After their release from Jail, the applicants shall attend the concerned Police Station on every first Monday of the month between 11.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. If the said Monday comes on a holiday or non-Court working day, he shall attend the Court on the immediate next working day.

¶23

Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶24

(A.S.GADKARI, J.)

¶25

Aarti Palkar

¶26

2/2

Tatya Pandurang Gaikwad and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tatya Pandurang Gaikwad and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Navyug Distributors Vs M/S. Kalyan Book Centre and Ors.

Iqbal Mohammed Mustafa Sayyed Vs State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Rohan Sharad Pawar

Altaf Habibkhan Pathan Vs the Inspector of Police and Ors.

Kiran Gorakshnath Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra

Aparna Sunil Kasar Vs Sunil Pradeep Kasar and Ors.