Disposed
Sujata Chandrakant Gole v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/1383/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(3)APPANo.13832017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1383 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.657 OF 2017
Sujata Chandrakant Gole ... Applicant/Intervenor
In the Matter in Between :
Rushikesh Tukaram Gole ... Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Vaibhav R. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Senior Counsel i/b. Mr.Rahul K. Dhaygude, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 9th APRIL 2018.
P.C. :
1 This is an application with a prayer that the applicant being First Informant be permitted to intervene and oppose the Criminal Appeal as well as Criminal Application filed therein.
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(3)APPANo.13832017
2 Considering the fact that the application is by the First Informant, the learned Advocate appearing for her is permitted to assist the prosecutor at the time of hearing of the Appeal as well as applications filed therein.
3 With this, the instant Criminal Application stands disposed of.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Sujata Chandrakant Gole
Rushikesh Tukaram Gole
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court