The Bombay High Court granted leave to the appellant to withdraw its appeal (Logd No. 446 of 2017) arising out of a Company Petition. The appeal was allowed to be withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the appeal granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902appl446-17.doc
1
pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (LODG) NO.446 OF 2017 in
COMPANY PETITION NO.308 OF 2012
Sezal Glass Limited (now Sejal Glass Ltd.) Versus
...Appellant
Shuabhi Investments Pvt.Ltd. ...Respondent
Ms.Anaisha Zachariah I/b. Crawford Bayley & Co., for the Appellant.
Ms.Krina Gandhi I/b. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., for the Respondent.
CORAM: NARESH H.PATIL AND G.S.KULKARNI, JJ
DATED: 26th JULY, 2018
P.C.:
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Prashant Vilas Rane
Digitally signed by Prashant Vilas Rane Date: 2018.07.30 12:48:24 +0530
Sezal Glass Limited
Shuabhi Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Naresh H. Patil
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
