Disposed
The Advertising Standards Council of India v. Puro Wellness Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay HCAPP/235/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.app 235.18.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 235 OF 2018 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1136 OF 2018 IN SUIT (L) NO. 656 OF 2018
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 489 OF 2018
The Advertising Standards Council of India .. Appellant Vs.
Puro Wellness Private Limited .. Respondent
Mr.Ambadas V. Chatuphale, for the Appellant. Dr.Birendra Saraf a/w Mr.Hiren Kamod, Mr.Nishad Nadkarni i/b Khaitan & Co., for Respondent.
CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL &
G.S.KULKARNI JJ. DATE : 04th JULY 2018
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submits
that pleadings in the Notice of Motion are complete.
04/06/2018.
1/2
6.app 235.18.doc
influenced by the observations made in the impugned order.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (NARESH H.PATIL, J.)
2/2
The Advertising Standards Council of India
Puro Wellness Private Limited
NARESH H.PATIL
G.S.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court