The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the criminal application. The High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without any substantive legal discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-APL-695-17
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 695 OF 2017
(Alok S/o. Madanmohan Mishra vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr )
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.M. Ghodeswar APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ .
DATE : 8.3.2018
1] Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition.
2] Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
**_BDP-SPS_*
Alok
State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
M. G. Giratkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
