The High Court of Judicature at Nagpur disposed of the Criminal Appeal as withdrawn after the appellant stated they received the cheque amount and no longer wished to prosecute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Apeal464-09.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Criminal Appeal No.464/2009
(Smt. Sushila Premanand Yende .vs. Nandkumar Hiralal Gandhi and another )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. R.D. Bhuibhar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Firdos Mirza, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs. Swati Kolhe, APP for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : Manish Pitale, J. DATED : July 05, 2018.
A pursis has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant stating that since the appellant has received the amount covered under the cheque in question from respondent no.1, the appellant does not wish to prosecute this appeal any further. Hence appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE
halwai
Smt. Sushila Premanand Yende
Nandkumar Hiralal Gandhi
Respondent No. 2
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
