Criminal Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to engage an advocate after discharging the previous one, leading to the appeal being filed on 8 May 2016. The order was issued on 19 April 2018.
Criminal Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 902.APEAL.444.2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.444 OF 2016
Vikas Prabhakar Yadav
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Appellant Respondents
None present for appellant. Ms.S.V.Sonawane, APP, for State.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 19th April 2018
PC :
“ The report from the concerned jail is placed on file. On perusing it we are satisfied that the Appellantaccused is informed that his Advocate Rajendra Rathod has since been discharged from the case. The said Advocate has informed the Registry that the accused has collected the papers from him and obtained his signature and NOC on the Vakalatnama of another Advocate. No Advocate is engaged by the accused till date. This is a Criminal Appeal pending in this Court from the date of its institution namely 8 May 2016. The Special Case is numbered 19 of 2015.
In view of the above, the accused be informed finally that the Appeal is now placed for dismissal by this Court on 19 April 2018.”
2 of 2 902.APEAL.444.2016
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
MST
Vikas Prabhakar Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadhikari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
