In Criminal Appeal No.432 of 2002, the Single Judge observed that the appellant did not appear and the Advocate on record stated they had no instructions to pursue the appeal. The court concluded the appellant was not interested in the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Priya Soparkar
906 apeal 432-02-cr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.432 OF 2002
Shri P.G.Nair … Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents
Ms.Sapna Krishnappa i/by Mr. J.S.Kini for the Appellant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : APRIL 17, 2018.
P.C.:
that she tried to contact the appellant on various occasions, however, the appellant did not respond. That the Advocate on record has no instructions to pursue with the appeal.
…..
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal should be allowed to proceed when the appellant is not appearing and the advocate on record states they have no instructions.
Shri P.G.Nair
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
P.C. Gaiger
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
