Appellant sought leave to withdraw criminal appeal after admitting receipt of settlement amount from respondent. Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of appeal.
Leave to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apeal426.17.O.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.426 OF 2017
(Kunal Pramod Mishra Vs. Manish Purushottam Manshani)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for Appellant. Shri S.V. Bhoyar, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J. DATE: 2 nd MAY, 201 8 .
Shri Bhoyar, the learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record two documents which are marked exhibits ‘A’ and ‘B’ for identification.
The documents reveal that the appellant accepts to have received total amount of Rs.4,25,000/- from the respondent.
In view of the settlement of the dispute inter se, Shri Dharmadhikari, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE
NSN
Kunal Pramod Mishra
Manish Purushottam Manshani
ROHIT B. DEO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
