The High Court of Bombay directed the appellant to provide the correct address of respondent No. 1 within eight weeks, failing which the appeal would be dismissed.
Appellant directed to provide fresh address of respondent No. 1 within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-APPEAL-396-2001.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.396 OF 2001
UNION OF INDIA
)...APPELLANT
V/s.
RAMNATH VISHNU NAIK AND ANR. )...RESPONDENTS
Mr.N.Natrajan, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 14th FEBRUARY 2018
P.C. :
1 It is seen that in this old appeal of the year 2001, contesting respondent no.1 could not be served by the appellant, who is Union of India. Respondent no.2 is the formal party i.e. State of Maharashtra.
2 Vide order dated 25th September 2017, this court had granted six weeks time to the appellant for providing correct address of respondent no.1. Compliance of this order is not done.
avk 1/2
27-APPEAL-396-2001.doc
3 In this view of the matter, the appellant is directed to tender fresh and correct address of respondent no.1 and to serve respondent no.1 by taking all necessary steps, within a period of eight weeks from today, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the court.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
Union of India
Ramnath Vishnu Naik
State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
