In Criminal Appeal No.211/2014, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the appeal as having been withdrawn after the parties entered into a settlement agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apeal211.14.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.211/2014
Pramod Govindrao Mankar ..vs.. Vijay Nathmal Sharma
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. Vyas, Advocate for appellant.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J, DATED : JULY 16, 2018
In this appeal, a joint Pursis, Stamp No.3120/2018, is filed on behalf of the parties and it is also signed by their respective counsel, stating that the parties have settled the matter amicably and that, therefore, the appellant desires to withdraw the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE
kahale
Pramod Govindrao Mankar
Vijay Nathmal Sharma
Manish Pitale
Kahale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
