Appeal rendered infructuous and disposed of because the underlying FIR was quashed in a concurrent application dated 11.04.2018, eliminating the cause for prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APEAL192-18
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 192/2018
(RAJU DHARMA RATHOD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO PS PARVA, TALUKA ARNI, DISTRICT YAVATMAL & ANOTHER)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATE : APRIL 11, 2018.
In view of the order dated 11.04.2018 in Criminal Application (APL) No.118 of 2018, it would not be necessary to prosecute the appeal. Since the first information report registered against the appellant is quashed and set aside, the cause for filing the appeal is rendered infructuous.
Hence, we dispose of the criminal appeal.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Raju Dharma Rathod
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A Naik
Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
