Disposed

Arun Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC5 Apr 2018APEAL/166/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Criminal Appeal and associated application were disposed of without expressing opinions on rival contentions. The court directed the Special Judge to decide a pending Misc. Application expeditiously and granted liberty to revive an interim relief request if the disposal is delayed beyond the directed period.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Special Judge to dispose of Misc. Application No. 378 of 2016 within four weeks; liberty granted to revive interim relief request if delayed.

Arun Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs the State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

APEAL 166-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 166 OF 2018

¶4

Arun Kumar Sharma & Ors. .. Appellants V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶5

WITH

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 464 OF 2018 IN

¶7

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 166 OF 2018

¶8

Pankaj Ramnaresh Saraf .. Applicant In the matter between: Arun Kumar Sharma & Ors. .. Appellants V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶9

Mr. Murtuza Nazmi i/b Mr. Dilip H. Shukla for the appellants. Mr. Avinash B. Avhad, Special PP with Ms. M.H. Mhare, APP for the State.

¶10

Mr. Sandeep Karnik for the applicant in APPA No. 464 of 2018.

¶11

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &

¶12

PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 5^TH APRIL 2018

1 of 3

ABS

APEAL 166-2018

P.C.:

By this appeal, the appellants challenge the order dated 30^th January 2018 on Misc. Application No. 1555 of 2017.

¶19

During the course of arguments, it was brought to our notice that Misc. Application No. 378 of 2016 in which Misc. Application No. 1555 of 2017 was made, is still pending. In such circumstances, both sides agree that the present appeal can be disposed of with a direction to the Special Judge to take up and decide the Misc. Application No. 378 of 2016 as expeditiously as possible and pass final orders thereon within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶20

In the event Misc. Application No. 378 of 2016 is not disposed of within the time directed by this Court, liberty is granted to the applicant to revive his request for grant of interim relief. That application then will be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law uninfluenced by the observations in the impugned order.

¶21

We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on the rival contentions.

¶22

The Criminal Appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

2 of 3

ABS

APEAL 166-2018

In view of disposal of the Appeal, Criminal Application No. 464 of 2018 does not survive and is disposed of.

¶27

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶28

3 of 3

¶29

ABS

Arun Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Leighton India Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Government Pleader, and Ors.

Omnarayan @ Omnath Amarnath Sharma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Omnarayan @ Omnath Amarnath Sharma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amir Ismail Sayyad @ Billa Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shendya @ Mangesh Subhash Malche Vs the State of Maharashtra

Tilakdhari Ramjit Verma Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.