In criminal appeal No. 138 of 2018, the court held that since the appellant was already arrested during the pendency of the appeal challenging rejection of anticipatory bail, the application was rendered infructuous and disposed of without further hearing.
Appeal disposed of as infructuous due to appellant's arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.APEAL.138.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.138 OF 2018
Shekhar Ankush Survase … Appellant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
... Respondent
Mr. Sagar Tambe i/b. Ritesh Thobde, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J.
DATED : 26th OCTOBER 2018.
P.C. :
arrested. The appeal challenging rejection of anticipatory bail.
accordingly disposed of.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
1/1
Aarti Palkar
Shekhar Ankush Survase
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
