Appeal by Jayram Koraga Shetty against an order dated 200850.80.2016 in a rent case filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction was dismissed for want of prosecution. The appellant did not appear despite being called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
22..ao.80.2016=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 80 OF 2016 IN
L.C. SUIT NO. 66 OF 2016
Jayram Koraga Shetty Vs.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
None for appellant.
Mrs. Madhuri M. More, Advocate for respondent-BMC
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER 2018
P.C.
2016, the appellant has issued a communication stating therein that as per the notice issued by the Municipal Corporation, the structure in question has been demolished.
1/2
Shraddha Talekar PS
2
22..ao.80.2016=.doc
(A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
2/2
Shraddha Talekar PS
Jayram Koraga Shetty
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
