Disposed
Smt.Akashani Jaypal Chaugule v. Shri.Neminath Tatoba Roje
Bombay HCAO/626/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-cas-1716-17.doc
Trupti
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1716 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 28879 OF 2017
Smt. Akashani Jaypal Chaugule & Ors.
…Applicants
Versus
Shri. Neminath Tatoba Roje & Ors. …Respondent
Mr.Sarwadnya S.Kadtane i/b. Mr.Kuldeep U. Nikam for the Applicants.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : MARCH 01, 2018
P.C.:
1 / 2
24-cas-1716-17.doc
Trupti
they took time to approach the counsel. Hence, delay is caused.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 / 2
Smt. Akashani Jaypal Chaugule
Shri. Neminath Tatoba Roje
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court