As this is a thin order, no substantive summary is available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AO 62.2017+CA.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APEAL FROM ORDER NO. 62 OF 2017
WITH
CA/14521/2017 IN AO/62/2017
M/S ELLORA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR SALEEM AHMED KHAN,
AURANGABAD
VERSUS
CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD. THROUGH ITS CHIEF ENGINEER AND ANOTHER.
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ranbir L. Chhabda Advocate for Respondents : Mr A.S. Bajaj
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: July 24, 2018
PER COURT :-
and learned counsel appearing for respective respondents.
aaa/-
2 AO 62.2017+CA.odt
delay on the part of the respondent/CIDCO, cost of the project has been increased, and ultimately the appellant would be sufferer, in case appellant is not allowed to carry out further construction. It is submitted that the appellant prayed before the trial court to allow him to continue with the work, however, the concerned Court without appreciating the said contentions raised by the appellant rejected the prayer.
aaa/-
AO 62.2017+CA.odt
3
herein above are prima facie in nature and confined to the adjudication of the present appeal from order.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
...
aaa/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal from the order rejecting the appellant's prayer to continue construction should be allowed.
Whether allowing the application would cause irreparable loss to the public.
M/S ELLORA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD
V.K. JADHAV
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
