In acriminal appeal against acquittal under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the High Court held that arguable questions were raised regarding the assessment of evidence. The court granted leave to file the appeal and called for the records.
Leave to file a criminal appeal against acquittal is granted and proceedings are called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Tikam
ALP 30 of 2014.dot
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 30 OF 2014 (FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL)
Machhindra Mahadeo Chikhalkar Vs.
Shivaji Krishna Rambhare and Anr.
...Applicant
...Respondents
Mr. Suraj Naik i/b. R.D. Suryawanshi for Applicant Mr. Manoj G. Patil for Respondent No.1 Mr. P.H. Gaikwad – Patil – APP for the State
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 16 JANUARY, 2018.
P.C. :-
1/2
Tikam
ALP 30 of 2014.dot
ORDER
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
Tikam
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to file a special leave petition against acquittal in a cheque dishonour case should be granted.
Whether the trial court correctly assessed the evidence regarding the accused's defence that the cheque was stolen.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Machhindra Mahadeo Chikhalkar
Shivaji Krishna Rambhare
the State
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
