In an anticipatory bail application where the applicant failed to appear on the scheduled date and the court was informed of his lack of interest in prosecuting the matter, the application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
920- ABA 659 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 659 OF 2018
Akash Babu Pillai ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
None for Applicant
Mr. Prashant Jadhav-APP
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATE: JULY 24, 2018
P.C.
2018, the matter was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for
the Applicant.
1/2
V.A. Tikam
not interested in prosecuting the application. Application for bail stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.]
2/2
V.A. Tikam
Akash Babu Pillai
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
