Amit Kumar Samarbahadur Singh v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, examining a case of alleged fraud involving customer payments and bogus receipts for motorcycles, held that the applicant did not deserve pre-arrest bail due to serious allegations and uninvestigated recovery of defalcated amounts, rejecting the bail application.
What did the court decide?
Interim relief granted earlier was withdrawn and the anticipatory bail application was rejected.
What the court decided
22-aba-437-18
1 /4
Nalawade
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 437 OF 2018 Amitkumar S.Singh vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr.
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or Court’s or Judge’s orders directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. P.D. Prasad Rao with A.R.Pandey and R.K. Pandey for the Applicant.
Mrs. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Prakash Wagh for the Intervener.
CORAM :A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 15th June, 2018
P.C.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves pre-arrest bail in a case alleging defalcation and issuing of bogus receipts for Royal Enfield Bullet Motorcycles.
Whether the prima facie evidence of complicity and uninvestigated material regarding the recovery of defalcated amount justifies rejection of bail.
Whether the allegations of fraud in issuing bogus receipts and defalcating customer payments warrant denial of anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Amitkumar S. Singh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- intervenor
Assadi Noorani Inteqam West
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court