The applicant sought anticipatory bail but requested permission to withdraw the application upon court instructions, committing to appearing before the concerned court within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 912.2514.18 aba.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2514 OF 2018
Rohan @ Babu Ratan Mhatre ….Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent
Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar i/b Sameer Mangaonkar for the applicant Mr. R. M. Pethe APP for the State. Mr. A. M. Tadavi, API
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATED : 21st DECEMBER, 2018
P.C.
After arguing for some time, when the Court was not inclined to grant relief, the learned Advocate for the applicant on instructions seek permission to withdraw this application. It is submitted that the applicant would give notice to the Investigating Officer and would appear before the concerned Court within a week.
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
Rohan @ Babu Ratan Mhatre
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
