The applicant, who had filed an anticipatory bail application, sought and was granted leave to withdraw the application unconditionally.
Leave to withdraw the application unconditionally granted; Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
919-ABA-227-18
1 /1
Nalawade A.S.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2018 Nitin D. Saxena vs. The State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. S.G.Musale for M.S.Kadu for the Applicant. Mr.M.G.Patil, APP. for the State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 06th June, 2018
P.C.
when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, the learned
counsel on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the application unconditionally.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Nitin D. Saxena
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
