The single-judge High Court rejected a second anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant, holding the application devoid of merits as no new circumstances existed since the withdrawn earlier application.
Application rejected on the ground of being devoid of merits due to lack of changed circumstances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.ABA.2244.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2244 OF 2017
Amrin Sharif Bagwan … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. B.A. Aloor for the Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe S.S. Hulke, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.
DATE : 15th JANUARY 2018
P.C.:
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Aarti Palkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be allowed given the applicant is a repeat applicant without change in circumstances.
Amrin Sharif Bagwan
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
