IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Liberty to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p1.aba164.18.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2018
Dhiraj Punaji Thite.
..Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
..Respondent.
Mr. Ashish R. Raghuvanshi, advocate for applicant.
Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J.
DATE : JULY 13, 2018.
P. C. :
1 Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2 The learned Counsel for the applicant upon instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.]
Talwalkar
Dhiraj Punaji Thite
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
