In this High Court of Bombay judgment, Justice A.S. Gadkar dismissed an anticipatory bail application. The court noted that the interim relief granted earlier was vacated due to non-compliance, and the applicant did not appear, leading to the application being dismissed for non-prosecution.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
aba.134-2018.doc
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2018
Suraj Narsappa Sallian & Anr. ….Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
None for applicants.
Ms. J.S. Lohokare, APP for State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 4th June 2018.
P.C.:
1] By an Order dated 2nd May 2018, interim relief which was granted by an Order dated 23.1.2017 stood vacated, on the ground that the applicants did not comply with the statement made on 23.1.2018. Today none appears for the applicants.
2] Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed due to non-prosecution and failure to appear?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suraj Narsappa Sallian & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkar i
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
