Single judge order on a civil suit where parties filed consent terms. The court accepted the consent, recorded undertakings, decreed the suit, and directed refund of court fees.
Suit decreed in terms of consent terms; undertakings accepted; refund of court fees ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
s 332 of 2018 .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.332 OF 2018
Nirmal Mohanlal Sakaria
… Plaintiffversus
Orbit Ventures Developers and Ors.
…Defendants
Mr. Kunal Bhanage with Ms. Nita Solanki, for Plaintiffs.
Ms. Shirin Khorasi, for Defendants.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 28th JUNE, 2018
P.C.:
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2. The learned Advocates appearing for the parties have tendered Consent
Terms dated 28th June, 2018. They submit that the Consent Terms be taken on record
and the above Suit be decreed in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms
are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Consent Terms are signed
by the Plaintiff, Respondent No.2 for self and as partner of Respondent and
Respondent No.3. The Advocates for the parties have also signed the Consent
Terms. The undertakings recorded in the Consent Terms are accepted. The Suit is
decreed in terms of the Consent Terms, marked 'X'. Refund of Court Fees, if any, as
per rules.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
Orbit Ventures Developers
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court