The petitioner sought quashing of an FIR. The High Court of Bombay at Goa held that since the investigation was complete and a C summary was filed, the petition survived nothing and was accordingly disposed of.
Petition dismissed; case disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2016
SMT. SHERU SHIRODKAR. ... Petitioner
Versus
THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, MARGAO POLICE STATION AND ANR.,
... Respondents
Shri P. Kakodkar, Advocate holding for Shri Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. R. Rivankar, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1. Shri Carlos Alvares Ferreira, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date:14th December 2017
P.C.
By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking quashing of the FIR No.52/2016 dated 24.02.2016 registered with the P.S. Margao. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation in the matter is complete and the Investigation Officer has filed a 'C' summary report before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class at Margao.
WPCR/39/2016
2
final summary report on its own merits and in accordance with law.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
arp/*
SMT. SHERU SHIRODKAR
THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, MARGAO POLICE STATION
ANR.
C. V. BHADANG
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
