The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of a writ petition jointly settled by parties. The court accepted consent terms dated 16/03/2017 and ordered the petition to be dismissed without costs.
Petition disposed off based on consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 980 OF 2016
MRS. MILAN RITA PEREIRA., ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. Dharmanand R. Vernekar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Gurudas Dhargalkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondents no.1 and 4.
Mr. J. Abreu Lobo, Advocate for Respondents no.2 and 3.
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date:16th March, 2017
FINAL ORDER :
On hearing the parties for sometime and in the interest of justice as they have jointly settled the restricted issue and as reflected in the consent terms dated 16/03/2017 marked "X", and signed by the petitioner, the contesting respondent no.5 and their respective Advocates, therefore, in the interest of justice and in view of the Consent Terms, present petition is disposed off.
WP/980/2016
2
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
mv
MRS. MILAN RITA PEREIRA
STATE OF GOA
THR. CHIEF SECRETARY
ANOOP V. MOHTA
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
