This single-paragraph interim order directs the parties to maintain the status quo regarding possession of property pending availability of the concerned authority.
Direction to maintain status quo regarding possession pending availability of concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
931.wp.9543.2017.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9543 OF 2017
M/s Vikram Computec ...Petitioner
vs
Board of Directors of Central Bank of India & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr Mathews Nedumpara i/b Rohini M Amin for the Petitioner Mr O.A.Das for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, AND
SMT. BHARATI HARISH DANGRE, JJ. AUGUST 22, 2017.
ORDER :
The statement is made by the learned Counsel for
the Petitioner that the concerned Authority is not available today. Therefore, at this stage to avoid further complications, we are inclined to direct that the parties to maintain status-quo as of today at 3.30 p.m. The parties cannot be remedyless, and therefore, this interim protection of possession, based upon the averments so made in the
Petition.
Pg 1 of 2
931.wp.9543.2017.doc
order.
Pg 2 of 2
M/s Vikram Computec
Board of Directors of Central Bank of India & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
Bharati Harish Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
