Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly, noting that the withdrawal would not influence the trial court.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed and petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 95 OF 2017
Dhanaji Dhondiba Dhade ….Petitioner V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Prosper D'souza a/w. Mr. Rajendra Anbhule, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for respondent, State.
CORAM :- R.M. SAVANT & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE :- 8TH AUGUST, 2017.
P.C. :-
arguing the petition for some time, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the petition. The petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J)
Dhanaji Dhondiba Dhade
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Savant
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
