Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petition against DRAT order of Aurangabad. Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate Bench at Aurangabad.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw petition with liberty to approach appropriate Bench at Aurangabad High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
pr502wp9425-17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9425 OF 2017
Ruchi Amrish Lalwani (Jain) … Petitioner. V/s. State Bank of India and Others. … Respondents.
Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Rishabh Shah, Shirin Shaikh, Binjal Samani, Sneha Shinde i/by Rawal Shah & Co. for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE,JJ. DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2017
ORDER :
1 Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board in view of urgency.
2 Considering the facts and circumstances and the impugned order, against which the present petition is filed, is passed by the DRAT at Aurangabad, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach appropriate Bench at Aurangabad High Court. All points are kept open. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty.
3 Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order, issued by the Registry.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)
1/1
Borey
Ruchi Amrish Lalwani (Jain)
State Bank of India
Anoop V. Mocha
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
