Writ petition by trade union against Grocery Markets Board allowed to be withdrawn. The petition was disposed off as withdrawn based on instructions from the petitioner's advocate. No substantive legal issue was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913.wp.9215.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9215 OF 2013
Akhil Bhartiya Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union
..Petitioner
Vs.
Grocery Markets and Shops Board for Mumbai, Thane and Raigad Districts and Others
..Respondents
Ms. Prerana C. Janvekar a/w Ms Ranjana Todankar,for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Chinchwadkar,for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM :- S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- MARCH 1, 2017.
P. C.:
In terms of the instructions received by the advocate for the petitioner, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn. It is disposed off as withdrawn.
(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Aswale 1/1
Akhil Bhartiya Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union
Grocery Markets and Shops Board for Mumbai, Thane and Raigad Districts
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
B. P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
