Disposed

Ashok Manikrao Khamkar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC8 Dec 2017WP/8997/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court directed the Education Officer to decide a seniority objection under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules after hearing parties. Status quo was maintained pending the decision. Both writ petition and civil application were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directed Education Officer to decide seniority objection on merits after hearing parties within two months; status quo maintained; writ and civil application disposed of.

Ashok Manikrao Khamkar and Others Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

( 1 ) wp8997.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 8997 OF 2016

¶4

Ashok s/o. Manikrao Khamkar & Ors.

¶5

Ashok s/o. Manikrao Khamkar & Ors...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors...Respondents

¶6

Mr.N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms.R.P. Gour, AGP for respondent/State.

¶7

WITH

¶8

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13885 OF 2017

¶9

Anna s/o. Santram Pansare..Applicant

¶10

Versus
Ashok s/o. Manikrao Khamkar & Ors...Respondents

¶11

Mr.S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr.N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for respondents/ori.petitioners.
Ms.R.P. Gour, AGP for respondent/State.

¶12

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :08.12.2017

¶13

P.C. :-

¶14

1.Mr. Jadhav, learned advocate for the petitioners
submits that the petitioners have filed objection with
the Education Officer to decide the seniority as per Rule
12 of the MEPS Rules. Same may be directed to be decided
on its own merit.

¶15

2.We have heard learned AGP. Mr.Thombre, learned
advocate appears for the applicant in Civil Application
No.13885 of 2017. Mr.Thombre, learned advocate also
contends about seniority.

¶16

3.Considering the fact that the petitioners in the
writ petition have already raised objection with regard
to seniority, it is for the Education Officer to decide
the objection as per Rule 12 of the MEPS Rules on its own
merits.

¶17

4.In the light of that, the Education Officer
shall decide the objection raised by the present
petitioners with regard to seniority on its own merits in
accordance with law, after hearing all the interested
parties, expeditiously, preferably within two months.
The parties shall appear before the Education Officer on
20.12.2017.

¶18

5.Mr. Jadhav, learned advocate for the petitioners
and Mr.Thombre, learned advocate for applicant in the
Civil Application submit that till the objection is
decided by the Education Officer, the parties be directed
to maintain status-quo.

¶19

6.Till the objection is decided by the Education
Officer, status-quo as on today be maintained.

¶20

7.The writ petition and the Civil Application are
disposed of. No costs.

¶21

[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]

¶22

[S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.]

¶23

snk/2017/DEC17/ wp8997.16

Ashok Manikrao Khamkar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Manikrao Khamkar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dayaram Dodhu Koli Vs the State of Mah and Anr.

Mangala Mangan Deore Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rafiuddin Nasiruuddin Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Digambar Govindrao Chakradhar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mohd Rizwanuddin Mohd Mumtazuddin Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Ranchhod Dharamdas Mali Vs Laxman Dharamdas Mali and Others