Hearing of a writ petition wherein the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw her petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly, vacating interim orders.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(901)-wp-896-17.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.896 OF 2017
Pooja Wadhwa ..Petitioner Versus Narsse Monjee Institute of Management studies and three others ..Respondents
Mr. Murlidharan a/w Ms. Kunjal Patil i/by M/s. Joy Legal Consultants for the Petitioner.
Ms. Manorama Mohanty i/by M/s. S. K. Srivastava and Company for the Respondent No.1.
Ms. Devyani Kulkarni for the Respondent No.2.
Mr. Hemant Haryan, AGP for the Respondent No.3 – State.
Mr. Rui A. Rodrigues for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
Mr. Ashraf Ahmed Shaikh for the Respondent No.7.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2017
P.C. 1] Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions of the
Petitioner, who is personally present in Court, seeks liberty to withdraw the Petition.
2] The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Needless to state that the interim orders granted, if any, shall stand vacated.
[M. S. KARNIK, J]
[B. R. GAVAI, J]
BGP.
1 of 1
Pooja Wadhwa
Narsse Monjee Institute of Management studies
B. R. GAVAI
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
