The petitioner submitted that no cause of action survives due to subsequent developments. The Court disposed of the criminal writ petition accordingly, with no substantive legal issue adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
131wp885.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Criminal Writ Petition No.885 of 2016 (Surendra @ Suryashekhar M. Khorgade .vs. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Nagpur and another )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr.S.J.Kadu, A.P.P. for respondents/State.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & S.B. Shukre, JJ. DATED : January 13, 2017.
Mr.H.S.Meshram, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition. Hence, the same is disposed of as such.
JUDGE
JUDGE
jaiswal
Surendra @ Suryashekhar M. Khorgade
The Superintendent, Central Prison, Nagpur
The State
B.R. Gavai
S.B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
