Petitioner challenged non-allotment of land to his family by the Committee. Court directed petitioner to approach appropriate authorities via alternate remedies for intra-family distribution disputes. Petition disposed of.
Petition disposed of with liberty to approach appropriate authorities via alternate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp8794.16.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8794 OF 2016
Sk. Karim Bannu Sajuk
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
& others
Respondents
Mr. Y.D. Kale, advocate holding for Mr. R.R. Karpe, advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 6.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ. DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2017
PER COURT:
wp8794.16.odt
{2}
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Sk. Karim Bannu Sajuk
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
