Petitioner sought premature release. Court held categorization pending with State Government. Directed State to decide on petitioner's categorization within six weeks.
Direction to State Government to decide on petitioner's categorization within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.2CWP.863.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 863 OF 2016. (Suraj Shyam Arkhel .vs. The State of Maharashtra & another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.D. Wankhede, Advocate & Ms. L.Y. Malewar, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. S.J. Kadu, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2017.
The petitioner has approached this Court praying for his premature release. The learned A.P.P. states that the matter regarding the petitioner's categorization is pending before the State Government. We, therefore, dispose of the petition with a direction to the State Government to take decision with regard to categorization of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from today.
Judge
Judge J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted premature release pending categorization decision.
Suraj Shyam Arkhel
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
KUM. INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
