Single bench observation dismissing a writ petition challenging the condonation of a 185-day delay in filing an appeal by the District Judge.
Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
75 WRIT PETITION NO. 8429 OF 2017
HARISH BALU PATIL VERSUS
SHARDA HARISH PATIL
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Ahinkya Kale Talekar Associates
Advocate for Respondent : Mrs R P Gour h/f S B Rajebhosale ... CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J. Dated: November 06, 2017
PER COURT :-
I do not find any substance in this writ petition.
Delay of 185 days caused in filing the appeal has been condoned by the District Judge-1, Nandurbar with reasoned order. No interference is required. Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. )
...
aaa/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned District Judge was justified in condoning the significant delay of 185 days in filing the appeal.
HARISH BALU PATIL
SHARDA HARISH PATIL
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
