A writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's partial relief to a Medical Officer was dismissed. The Court held that the benefit was appropriate given that similarly situated Medical Officers received upholding of the same Tribunal judgment by a Division Bench.
Writ petition dismissed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 799.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 799 OF 2016
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Petitioners
Versus
Dr. Shivkumar Narwsingrao Halkude
.. Respondent
Shri S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for the Petitioners. Shri J. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent / Sole.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 4 th December, 2017
PER COURT :
2 wp 799.16
costs.
[S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
marathe/Dec.17
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the State to challenge the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's judgment granting conditional benefits to an adhoc Medical Officer deemed similarly situated to others where relief wa
Whether the State can assail the Tribunal's judgment allowing counting of adhoc service for increments and earned leave after a Division Bench upheld a similar judgment.
State of Maharashtra and others
Dr. Shivkumar Narwsingrao Halkude
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
