Anusayabai Suryabhan Aher and Others v. Mandyabai Suryabhan Aher and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
911 WP.7961.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 7961 OF 2017
ANUSAYABAI SURYABHAN AHER AND OTHERS VERSUS MANDYABAI SURYABHAN AHER AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Abasaheb D. Shinde. Advocate for Respondents : Mrs. A. N. Ansari.
CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J. DATE : 08th November, 2017.
P.C.:
. I do not find any substance in this writ petition. In a decree of the year 2005, the Respondent / Decree Holder has filed an application for police protection and the learned Judge of the Trial Court vide its impugned order dated 4th January, 2017 in Regular Darkhast No.79 of 2014 below Exhibit 25, allowed the said application and granted police protection to the Decree Holder to carry out certain work like cleaning, maintenance etc. in the suit property. There is no reason to challenge such an order when the Judgment Debtor has not objected the execution of the said decree on any other substantial ground. The writ petition is hereby dismissed. No costs.
[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ]
ndm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's order granting police protection to a decree holder under Section 138(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
ANUSAYABAI SURYABHAN AHER AND OTHERS
MANDYABAI SURYABHAN AHER AND ANOTHER
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court