The High Court disposed of a withdrawal application under the Goa Regularization of Unauthorised Construction Act, 2016 without expressing an opinion on the merits of the regularization petition.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; no order as to costs; Court reserves opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 782 OF 2015
SHRI.DAMODAR SANTAPPA AIGAL. Versus CHIEF OFFICER, MORMUGAO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, VASCO.
... Petitioner
... Respondent
Mr. Ashwin D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sandesh D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:16th February, 2017
P.C:
The learned Counsel for the petitioner has placed on record an application seeking withdrawal of the petition, on the ground that the petitioner has applied for regularization under the provisions of the Goa Regularization of Unauthorised Construction Act, 2016.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
EV
SHRI.DAMODAR SANTAPPA AIGAL
CHIEF OFFICER, MORMUGAO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, VASCO
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
