The High Court Bench at Aurangabad held that the issues in numerous consolidated writ petitions were fully covered by previous orders in WP 5182/2017 and WP 6879/2017, allowing no different view.
Writ petitions were dismissed as the controversy was covered by prior judgments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp 4953.17+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4953 OF 2017
VINAYAK MANIKRAO KALE AND ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. V.D. Salunke GP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.B. Girase AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.R. Kale
WITH
WP/6725/2017 WITH WP/6729/2017 WITH WP/6749/2017 WITH WP/6888/2017 WITH WP/6891/2017 WITH WP/6892/2017 WITH WP/6893/2017 WITH WP/6894/2017 WITH WP/6895/2017 WITH WP/6896/2017 WITH WP/6898/2017 WITH WP/6899/2017 WITH WP/6900/2017 WITH WP/6901/2017 WITH WP/6903/2017 WITH WP/7075/2017 WITH WP/7076/2017 WITH WP/7078/2017 WITH WP/7087/2017 WITH WP/7107/2017 WITH WP/7108/2017 WITH WP/7111/2017 WITH WP/7114/2017 WITH WP/7117/2017 WITH WP/7121/2017 WITH WP/7122/2017 WITH WP/7123/2017 WITH WP/7125/2017 WITH WP/7128/2017 WITH WP/7158/2017 WITH WP/7161/2017 WITH WP/7175/2017 WITH WP/7176/2017 WITH WP/7177/2017 WITH WP/7178/2017 WITH WP/7179/2017 WITH WP/7187/2017 WITH WP/7206/2017 WITH WP/7207/2017 WITH WP/7208/2017 WITH WP/7209/2017 WITH WP/7212/2017 WITH WP/7213/2017 WITH WP/7214/2017 WITH WP/7215/2017 WITH WP/7217/2017 WITH WP/7218/2017 WITH WP/7219/2017
( 2 ) wp 4953.17+
WITH WP/7225/2017 WITH WP/7234/2017 WITH WP/7240/2017 WITH WP/7245/2017 WITH WP/7246/2017 WITH WP/7248/2017 WITH WP/7249/2017 WITH WP/7250/2017 WITH WP/7251/2017 WITH WP/7255/2017 WITH WP/7256/2017 WITH WP/7258/2017 WITH WP/7261/2017 WITH WP/7262/2017 WITH WP/7263/2017 WITH WP/7265/2017 WITH WP/7267/2017 WITH WP/7272/2017 WITH WP/7276/2017 WITH WP/7277/2017 WITH WP/7283/2017 WITH WP/7286/2017 WITH WP/7289/2017 WITH WP/7291/2017 WITH WP/7292/2017 WITH WP/7297/2017 WITH WP/7305/2017 WITH WP/7308/2017 WITH WP/7309/2017 WITH WP/7315/2017 WITH WP/7325/2017 WITH WP/7330/2017 WITH WP/7335/2017 WITH WP/7339/2017 WITH WP/7340/2017 WITH WP/7342/2017 WITH WP/7345/2017 WITH WP/7346/2017 WITH WP/7347/2017 WITH WP/7348/2017 WITH WP/7350/2017 WITH WP/7351/2017 WITH WP/7372/2017 WITH WP/7373/2017 WITH WP/7374/2017 WITH WP/7375/2017 WITH WP/7376/2017 WITH WP/7377/2017 WITH WP/7381/2017 WITH WP/7435/2017 WITH WP/7441/2017 WITH WP/7443/2017 WITH WP/7444/2017 WITH WP/7445/2017 WITH WP/7446/2017 WITH WP/7447/2017 WITH WP/7448/2017 WITH WP/7449/2017 WITH WP/7450/2017 WITH WP/7453/2017 WITH WP/7454/2017 WITH WP/7455/2017 WITH WP/7456/2017 WITH WP/7457/2017 WITH WP/7458/2017 WITH WP/7459/2017 WITH WP/7460/2017 WITH WP/7461/2017 WITH WP/7462/2017 WITH WP/7463/2017 WITH WP/7464/2017 WITH WP/7465/2017 WITH WP/7466/2017 WITH WP/7468/2017 WITH WP/7536/2017 WITH WP/7537/2017 WITH WP/7538/2017 WITH WP/7539/2017 WITH WP/7540/2017 WITH WP/7541/2017 WITH WP/7594/2017
( 3 ) wp 4953.17+
WITH WP/7598/2017 WITH WP/7605/2017 WITH WP/7616/2017 WITH WP/7617/2017 WITH WP/7618/2017 WITH WP/7619/2017 WITH WP/7620/2017 WITH WP/7621/2017 WITH WP/7622/2017 WITH WP/7623/2017 WITH WP/7624/2017 WITH WP/7625/2017 WITH WP/7626/2017 WITH WP/7627/2017 WITH WP/7628/2017 WITH WP/7629/2017 WITH WP/7630/2017 WITH WP/7631/2017 WITH WP/7632/2017 WITH WP/7633/2017 WITH WP/7634/2017 WITH WP/7635/2017 WITH WP/7636/2017 WITH WP/7637/2017 WITH WP/7638/2017 WITH WP/7639/2017 WITH WP/7640/2017 WITH WP/7641/2017 WITH WP/7642/2017 WITH WP/7643/2017 WITH WP/7644/2017 WITH WP/7645/2017 WITH WP/7647/2017 WITH WP/7648/2017 WITH WP/7665/2017 WITH WP/7666/2017 WITH WP/7668/2017 WITH WP/7669/2017 WITH WP/7670/2017 WITH WP/7671/2017 WITH WP/7672/2017 WITH WP/7673/2017 WITH WP/7674/2017 WITH WP/7731/2017 WITH WP/8476/2017 WITH WP/8478/2017 WITH WP/8486/2017 WITH WP/8542/2017 WITH WP/8543/2017 WITH WP/8545/2017 WITH WP/8547/2017 WITH WP/8555/2017 WITH WP/8706/2017 WITH WP/8707/2017 WITH WP/8708/2017 WITH WP/8709/2017 WITH WP/8710/2017
WITH WP/8711/2017 WITH WP/8712/2017
S/Shri V.P. Latange, A.V. Patil (Indrale), A.K. Tiwari, Hemantkumar F. Pawar, Kailash B. Jadhav, Chetan V. Bhadane, Pankat A. Bharat, S.S. Thombre, V.M. Maney, U.L Momale,
Abhijit S. More, Niteen V. Gaware, Amol R. Gaikwad, P.S. Chavan, Prabhakar K. Joshi, V.S. Undre, Mahesh S. Taur, Nilkhant R. Pawde,
( 4 ) wp 4953.17+
Sushant B. Choudhari, R.V. Gore, D.M. Shinde, S.J. Salunke,
Mahesh S. Deshmukh, Amol N. Kakade, B.S. Deshmukh, S.B. Gastgar, Prakash Singh P. Patil, Sachin S. Deshmukh, H.A. Joshi, M.S. Karad, N.P. Patil Jamalpurkar, N.E. Deshmukh, P.V. Jadhavar, N.S. Kadam Advocate for the Petitioners in respective petitions.
Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader a/w. Shri A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for Respondents/State Authorities.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 24.07.2017
P.C. :-
. Having heard the Petitioner's Advocate, we do not think that a view different, than taken in Writ Petition No.5182/2017 ( Hotel Sonai Beer Bar and Permit Room vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) decided by us on 07.07.2017, as well as in Writ Petition No. 6879/2017 ( Hotel Vrundawan vs. State of Maharashtra ) decided on 10.07.2017, can be taken. We are of the opinion that the controversy is fully covered by our orders in Writ Petition Nos. 5182/2017 and 6879/2017.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
mub
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the issues raised in the multiple writ petitions require a view different from the orders in Writ Petition Nos. 5182/2017 and 6879/2017.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hotel Sonai Beer Bar and Permit Room vs. State of Maharashtra and othersReferred¶21
Writ Petition No.5182/2017 ( Hotel Sonai Beer Bar and Permit Room vs. State of Maharashtra and others )
Hotel Vrundawan vs. State of MaharashtraReferred¶21
Writ Petition No. 6879/2017 ( Hotel Vrundawan vs. State of Maharashtra )
Vinayak Manikrao Kale
State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
