Two writ petitions challenging decisions regarding education admissions were disposed of as infructuous after concessions were obtained via approval letters.
Petitions disposed of as infructuous; rule discharged; interim orders vacated; no order as to cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 7091 & 7092 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No. 7091 of 2004 With
Civil Application No.10551 of 2006
Balaji s/o Gangadhar Aralikar. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. M.V. Ghatge, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. A.R. Borulkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
With
Writ Petition No. 7092 of 2004 With Civil Application No.10549 of 2006
Datram s/o Shesherao Bodke. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. M.V. Ghatge, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. A.R. Borulkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2 WP 7091 & 7092 of 2004
Coram: R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Date : 9 AUGUST 2017 ORAL ORDER:
Sd/- Sd/- (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.) rsl
Balaji s/o Gangadhar Aralikar
Datram s/o Shesherao Bodke
The State of Maharashtra
R.D. Dhanuka
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
