Petitioner challenged admission eligibility due to mark calculation discrepancies. Court found grievance satisfied as AICTE awarded revised marks qualifying petitioner.
Writ petition disposed of as petitioner qualified on revised marks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP6711.2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 6711 OF 2017
Dayanand Sambhajirao Manjaramkar
Petitioner...
Versus
The Government of India & Ors.
Respondents..
Mr S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the petitioner Mr D. G. Nagode, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr S. V. Advant, Advocate for respondent No. 2
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ. DATE : 3RD AUGUST, 2017.
ORDER :-
petition stands satisfied in view of the affidavit-in-reply dt. 31.7.2017 tendered by respondent No. 2 - AICTE, New Delhi. In para 18 of the reply, it is recorded thus:
“I further say that in response to the modified results of the petitioner after the review of the questions, 10 marks are added to his earlier score of 105 and his final result is declared to be 115. It is further stated that, he is qualified under his revised Mark Sheet.
2 WP6711.2017
[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ R. M. BORDE ] JUDGE JUDGE
sgp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to admission on the basis of revised marks.
Dayanand Sambhajirao Manjaramkar
The Government of India
R. M. BORDE
A. M. DHAVALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
