This single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition challenging a No Confidence Motion order. Relying on Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, the court held Rule 17 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Rules is non-mandatory, allowing the impugned order to stand.
The Writ Petition stands rejected. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
931.6024.17-wp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6024/2017
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. S. S. Kanetkar for the petitioner
Mrs. Kirti Kulkarni for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Rajesh Parab for respondent Nos.5 and 6. Mr. Vithal Bhalchandra Joshi, Tahasildar, Khed, in person.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 29, 2017
P.C.:
Basavraj G Patil
1/2
931.6024.17-wp
matter of Vishnu Ramchandra Patil & Ors. Vs. Group Gram Panchayat & Ors. 2013 3 BOM CR 517 .
JUDGE
Basavraj G Patil
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the procedure prescribed under Rule 17 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat (Meeting) Rules, 1959 is mandatory.
Whether the impugned order dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the No Confidence Motion is liable to be set aside for non-compliance with Rule 17.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vishnu Ramchandra Patil & Ors. Vs. Group Gram Panchayat & Ors.Distinguished¶1
Vishnu Ramchandra Patil & Ors. Vs. Group Gram Panchayat & Ors. 2013 3 BOM CR 517 · Who else cites this
Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale Vs. Navnath Tukaram Kakde & Ors.Relied on¶2
Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale Vs. Navnath Tukaram Kakde & Ors. 2014(6) Mh.L.J. 804 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Unidentified Petitioner
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 5
Respondent No. 6
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
