Disposed

Sanjay Jagannath Savade v. the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Buldhana and Others

Bombay HC18 Sept 2017WP/5786/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged cancellation of educational approval by Education Officer. High Court held power lies with Deputy Director, stopped court proceedings, and directed Deputy Director to decide pending appeal within three months.

What did the court decide?

Deputy Director of Education to decide pending appeal within three months; writ petition disposed of without costs.

Sanjay Jagannath Savade Vs the Education Officer… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1809wp5786.17.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.5786/2017

¶5

Sanjay Jagannath Savade ...Versus...

¶6

The Education Officer, (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Buldhana, Distt. Buldhana and others

¶7

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

Court's or Judge's orders

¶10

¶11

Shri S.M. Vaishnav, Advocate for petitioner Mrs. A.R. Kulkarni, AGP for respondent no.1

¶12

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATE : 18.09.2017

¶13

The approval granted on 29/4/2011 has been cancelled by Education Officer on 22/7/2016. This Court has, in Writ Petition No.3057/2017 and other connected matters, taken a view that such order of recall is not maintainable. Government itself has on 23/8/2017 taken out the Government Resolution and pointed out that such power is with Deputy Director of Education.

¶14

Learned Assistant Government Pleader has pointed out that as yet notices are not issued.

¶15

However, in petition, there is a statement that after order cancelling approval, an appeal in terms of Secondary School Code has been preferred with Deputy Director of Education and is pending.

¶16

1809wp5786.17.odt

¶17

¶18

Learned Assistant Government Pleader has invited our attention to the fact that said authority is not party to this petition.

¶19

We grant oral leave made by learned Counsel for petitioner and permit Deputy Director of Education to be added as party respondent no.4, subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/(Rupees Five Hundred Only) to High Court Bar Association. If the costs are paid and receipt is shown within three days, Registry to permit amendment.

¶20

If amendment is carried out, the added respondent no.4 to decide appeal pending before him, as per law, in next three months.

¶21

With these directions and keeping all rival contentions open, we dispose of the writ petition. No costs.

¶22

JUDGE JUDGE

¶23

Wadkar

Sanjay Jagannath Savade v. the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Buldhana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Jagannath Savade v. the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Buldhana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind S/O Motiram Salve and Another Vs the District Magistrate, Chandrapur and Others

Daji S/O Tangsu Salame and Others Vs the State of Maha., Department of School Education and Sports Deptt., Mumbai Thr. Secty. and Others

Sadashiv Narayan Mundhe Vs the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Buldhana and Others

Ku. Shweta D/O Dayaram Kakade Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Social Justice and Special Asst. Dept., Mumbai and Another

Kalpana W/O Umesh Bharshankar Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mumbai and Others

Pawan Shriram Yadav Vs Divisional Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and Others