In a writ petition regarding termination of services, the High Court observed that the petitioner had approached the school tribunal and disposed of the petition keeping the option of remedies open.
The writ petition was disposed of without interference, leaving the petitioner's option to avail of remedies available in law open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5776.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5776 OF 2017
Ramrao s/o Namdeorao Mule
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
& others
Respondents
Mr. V.A. Dhakne, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.B. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr. S.G. Kawade, advocate for respondent no.2. Mr. M.D. Shinde, advocate for respondents 3 and 4.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ. DATE : 8th NOVEMBER, 2017
PER COURT:
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Ramrao s/o Namdeorao Mule
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
